The Bermudan rig is crazy - Official!

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   Next >  Last >> 
  • 12 Nov 2014 07:54
    Reply # 3148049 on 3121186

    I wonder is this the origin of pointy sails? According to Brian Platt this Fishing junk was a "fast and weatherly type" rigundefined

    Last modified: 12 Nov 2014 07:57 | Anonymous member
  • 29 Oct 2014 03:23
    Reply # 3136345 on 3133274
    Gary King wrote:Interesting, its the foremast which suffers the most punishment by far. On top of that the motion in a confused sea (every time we rounded a cape basically) is fore and aft which side shrouds wouldn't help. Rolling is slow, its the pitching which is violent. I guess it would make you feel better and I think Annie's Badger had them too, but, its the foresail that does all the work on our boat.
    Badger most certainly did not have any shrouds (by definition, at the side of the mast: stays fore and aft) and I reckon that, if anything, they would make matters worse by putting a sudden shock, stop load on the mast's movement.  However, the whole issue of masts 'whipping' is not something I have really experienced.  Badger's masts hardly moved although the heads shuddered occasionally.  I've not had Fantail out in really violent seas, but whenever I've been through a big wake, although the top of the mast does wave around rather more than Badger's ever did, not by the wildest stretch of the imagination could I suggest that it whips.

    Perhaps the point is that if your mast whips, it simply isn't stiff enough?

    (I agree with Arne that lack of decent trees could well have a lot to do with the use of shrouds.)

  • 26 Oct 2014 21:15
    Reply # 3134002 on 3133921
    Then we come to the rig. The Wing Sail is a fine rig, but few in China would recognise it as a junk/Chinese rig. It arose mainly out of a western sailing tradition around 100 years ago. The only major 'junk feature' in those emerging from the Western junk rig community really is the sheeting of most or all panels along the leech.
    Wouldn't the fully-battened lugsail format, parrels and self-supporting mast be a clue?
  • 26 Oct 2014 16:20
    Reply # 3133921 on 3133863
    Deleted user
    John Kwong wrote:...to develop a Modern Junk Class which is a class racing junk using modern boat building technology .
    John

    This is a very interesting idea. The question that arises in my mind is, do you really intend to build a 'Modern Junk Class' - i.e. a junk executed using modern materials/technologies? If so, and the craft is to be recognisably a junk, you will need to choose your model carefully. Few junks had the kind of hull form to sail fast, and fewer still to sail close to the wind.

    As Stephen Davies points out, the perceived lack of windward ability of traditional junks was much more to do with hull form than with the rig. Most junk hulls (particularly the traders) - apart from a few around Guangdong - were built to travel up and down the Chinese coast with the prevailing monsoon, so had flat bottoms and no means of resisting leeway (apart from the questionable aid of a deep rudder). Some types were built with long keels/leeboards/centreboards (the latter well forward to operate in tandem with the deep rudder) which allowed them to hold their heads up against the wind to some degree. Some of these were also said to be quite fast and weatherly (mainly fishing junks such as the Amoy Fisher which had to operate across the wind).

    Then we come to the rig. The Wing Sail is a fine rig, but few in China would recognise it as a junk/Chinese rig. It arose mainly out of a western sailing tradition around 100 years ago. The only major 'junk feature' in those emerging from the Western junk rig community really is the sheeting of most or all panels along the leech.

    How much of what you propose is really going to be 'a junk using modern technologies'?


  • 26 Oct 2014 14:40
    Reply # 3133898 on 3121186

    Dear John,

    This is what I Call good News. Most regattas is done With massproducted boats. The biggest problem is overweight. To earn a CE certification, the manufacturers need to conform With American (!) building standards dictating a minimum thickness of the hull and deck. If my X-99 should be build and certified today, it would weigh in at Close to 3750 kg instead of the 2980 kg it weights today. This is negative to the boats ability to plane and go faster than hull speed. When the customers want more Comfort, all the added items only compounds the problem. I chose the X-99 because of the fast and light hull. The low price they collect was an extra bonus. The most popular class of boats for racing in Sweden and Norway is the Albin Express because that is a one design class being strictly monitored to keep it a one design class. To really boost Development of the Junk Rig, The hulls should be one class, sail aereal given, but saildesign free.

    Food for thought.

    Regards

    Ketil Greve 

  • 26 Oct 2014 12:39
    Reply # 3133863 on 3121186
    It's really rewarding reading this forum and learn from the junkies community. I am working with a designer to develop a Modern Junk Class which is a class racing junk using modern boat building technology . I learnt from here that a soft wing sail hung from a yard with unstayed mast may be most suitable. Any more suggestions on hull and sail design?
    Last modified: 26 Oct 2014 13:29 | Anonymous member
  • 26 Oct 2014 11:03
    Reply # 3133834 on 3121186

    Arne

    It must be quite frustrating, after all your hard work, research and comprehensive documentation, to find that even some JRA members think that junks can't sail to windward! It reminds me of the confusion that always surrounded advertising and mailing, where clients would ask 'Does mailing  (or advertising) work?' .The answer being, of course, that good advertising/mailing works, but bad doesn't. Good junk designs work, especially on good hull designs. Your comments on the latter topic are also spot on, as usual; Water Bear, with a completely conventional Hasler/McLeod flat junk rig, would occasionally out-sail bermudan boats to windward simply because the hull design was so superior that, in the right wind conditions, the flat junk sail could drive her close to the wind. I look forward with interest to hearing how the new owner will fare with a cambered sail - he might need a safety harness at all times...  With respect to the jib issue, there are, of course, enterprising solutions by JRA members to adding the jib without the problems you mention; Paul McKay's brilliant Aerojunk is a good example, also being an option for a rig where the camber doesn't require the sail to be shaped in construction. I think we just need more and better junks on the water everywhere to start dispelling the myths. But as the saying goes, those that know, know; those that don't, don't matter.

  • 25 Oct 2014 14:48
    Reply # 3133424 on 3121186

    I think I have mentioned it before, that the real whipping forces on the rig is when crashing into a wave. I had the good fortune of being able to command how strong I wanted the mast, (one of the benefits With a carbonfibre mast) without being punished With too much weight. The wooden mast of Edmond Dantes is probably stiffer than the mast on Marie G, but not stronger. Not having the stomac to watch a mast flexing of 1 meter at the top, I ended up With a mast weighing 61 kg instead of 43 Kg. I can live With that. Marie G is also very light weigh for a 10 m boat, (2960kg) and that is a negative factor when crashing about. Marie G have much more violent motions in a seaway than Edmond Dantes. 

  • 25 Oct 2014 09:33
    Reply # 3133377 on 3121186
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    My hunch is that the Hong Kong style junk sail, in particular the mainsail, is a result of this shortage of suitable timber for masts, which Gary points out. I have not seen any JR from China with a bigger sail area set on shorter masts than those mainsails in Hong Kong. These short masts also give a wider angle between shrouds and the masts, so it makes more sense to add shrouds to them.

    Besides, the Hong Kong style mainsail is as un-balanced as the gaff cat-rig sails in the US. When sailing close-hauled, the sheet will do its best to bend the mast aft, so it is no surprise that the shrouds seem to be set a bit forward (many catboats had a forestay for the same reason).

    Also note the hard-working Hong Kong parrels of these sails  -  they clearly bend the stout battens upwards. I guess these were compromises the sailors were willing to live with to save cost (and weight?) of the main mast. The rigs surely appear to work well.

    One of the fine things with wooden masts is that they need not be circular in section. I have had more than one of them made slightly oval with them being 10% thicker in the alongship direction. Now that I make hybrid aluminium-wood masts, I aim for a yield strength twice the  max righting moment of the boat. For serious offshore boats I would aim for a factor of 3. As the boats grow in size, these high strength factors will be more difficult to achieve, so I guess one must be more stress conscious when sailing bigger vessels.

    Arne

     

    Last modified: 25 Oct 2014 21:53 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 24 Oct 2014 23:56
    Reply # 3133274 on 3132938
    Deleted user
    Arne Kverneland wrote..
    I see no shrouds on the fore mast and mizzen on this one, at least.

    Arne

    Interesting, its the foremast which suffers the most punishment by far. On top of that the motion in a confused sea (every time we rounded a cape basically) is fore and aft which side shrouds wouldn't help. Rolling is slow, its the pitching which is violent. I guess it would make you feel better and I think Annie's Badger had them too, but, its the foresail that does all the work on our boat.

    Those big triple masted junks in Petersen's collection have the big mast from imported tree trunk, the small fore and mizzen probably local timber, they were paranoid enough to shroud the hugely expensive imported trunk. I'm just speculating. China was deforested and depended on Doug Fir from Canada for big masts from the 19th century and apparently cost more than the rest of the ship together. 

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software